Main Article Content

Ky Minh Nguyen
Hung Tri Quang Nguyen
Phuong Hoang Nguyen
Manh Cong Nguyen


As ecotourism continues to grow in Vietnam, the potential and willingness to pay (WTP) for eco-services need to be assessed. The focus of this was in the Natural Bird Park in Bien Bach Dong commune of Thoi Binh District, Ca Mau Province. WTP estimation during the period of 2020 to 2025 shows that the choice of payment level will range from 10,000 to 25,000 VND. The pre- diction for 2026 to 2030 the prices of 20,000and 25,000 VND was chosen as the highest rates. The regression equation of stage 1 showed adjusted R2 = 0.514; which means that 51.4% of the variability of the dependent variable can be explained by the studied model. The regression results also showed that the positive impact of education level (X3), occupation (F), income (X4) on the WTP are statistically significant (p<0.05). In contrast, the related variables such as gender (D) and number of trips (X5) had an negative effect on WTP. In the stage 2, a positive interaction of independent factors such as occupation (F) and income (X4) on the WTP in the period of 2026 to 2030 was also found. Although, the independent variables of age (X1), education (X3) and number of trips (X5) had an negative effect on WTP levels (p<0.05). The adjusted R2 value was equal to 0.438 and this model explained 43.8% of the variation in WTP. The results provide a scientific basis for proposing the appropriate ecotourism solutions in Thoi Binh District, Ca Mau Province.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Nguyen K, Nguyen H, Nguyen P, Nguyen M. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR ECO-SERVICES IN THE NATURAL BIRD PARK – CASE STUDY IN THOI BINH DISTRICT, CA MAU PROVINCE, VIET NAM. journal [Internet]. 14May2020 [cited 10Dec.2023];10(38):1-2. Available from:


[1] Sở Văn hóa, Thể thao và Du lịch tỉnh Cà Mau. Báo cáo tình hình hoạt động văn hóa, thể thao và du lịch năm 2018. Cà Mau; 2019.
[2] Pattanayak S.K., Kramer R.A. Pricing ecological services: Willingness to pay for drought mitigation from watershed protection in eastern Indonesia. Water Resources Research. 2001; 37(3):771–778.
[3] Nielsen-Pincus M., Sussman P., Bennett D.E., Gosnell H., Parker R. The Influence of Place on the Willingness to Pay for Ecosystem Services. Society & Natural Resources. 2017;30 (12):1423-1441.
[4] Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Ánh. Lượng hóa một số giá trị kinh tế của vườn quốc gia Cúc Phương góp phần bảo tồn
đa dạng sinh học [Luận văn Thạc sĩ]. Trường Đại học Khoa học Tự nhiên, Hà Nội; 2012.
[5] Lê Văn Hưng. Chi trả dịch vụ hệ sinh thái và khả năng áp dụng tại Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học và Phát triển. 2013;11(3):337-344.
[6] Hawcroft L.J., T.L. Milfont. The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last
30 years: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2010;30(2):143-158.
[7] Sousa E., Quintino V., Palhas J., Rodrigues A.M., Teixeira J. Can environmental educationactions change public attitudes? An example usingthe pond habitat and associated biodiversity. PlosOne. 2016;11(5):e0154440.
[8] Unterweger P.A., Schrode N., Betz O. Urban Nature: Perception and acceptance of alternative green space
management and the change of awareness after provision of environmental information. A chance for
biodiversity protection. Urban Science. 2017;1:24.
[9] Manzoor S.A., Malik A., Zubair M., Griffiths G., and Lukac M. Linking social perception and provision of
ecosystem services in a sprawling urban landscape: A case study of Multan, Pakistan. Sustainability. 2019;11:654.
[10] Aseres S.A., Sira R.K. Estimating visitors’ willingness to pay for a conservation fund: sustainable financing approach in protected areas in Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2020;6:e04500.
[11] Lê Thị Diệu Hiền, Nguyễn Quốc Nghi, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Yến và Ngô Bình Trị. Mức độ sẵn lòng chi trả
cho nhu cầu du lịch của người dân thành phố Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Cần Thơ. 2014;34:86-92.
[12] Zheng H., Tu Q. Analysis on Willingness to Pay for environmental services and its impacts in Jinhua River. International Conference on Management Science and Engineering, Moscow, Russia. 2009;752-758.
[13] Kristina Nicosia, Suhrudh Daaram, Ben Edelman, Lev Gedrich, Eric He, Sarah McNeilly, et al. Determining the willingness to pay for ecosystem service restoration in a degraded coastal watershed: A ninth grade investigation. Ecological Economics. 2014;104:145–151.
[14] KC B., Kandel P.N., Adhikari S. Economic valuation of ecosystem services in protected areas: A case study
from Nepal. Banko Janakari. 2013;23(1):42-50.
[15] Tống Yên Đan, Trần Thị Thu Duyên. Đánh giá nhận thức của cộng đồng về bảo tồn Sếu đầu đỏ. Tạp chí
Khoa học Trường Đại học Cần Thơ. 2010;16b:32-41.
[16] Cục Thống kê tỉnh Cà Mau. Niên giám thống kê tỉnh Cà Mau năm 2017. Cà Mau; 2018.
[17] Tổ hợp tác Toàn Thắng. Báo cáo hoạt động kinh doanh THT Toàn Thắng năm 2018. Thới Bình; 2019.
[18] UBND tỉnh Cà Mau. Điều kiện kinh tế xã hội tỉnh Cà Mau. Cà Mau; 2018.
[19] Likert R. A technique for measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 1932;140:5-55.
[20] Yamane T. Statistics - An Introductory Analysis. Harper and Row, New York; 1967.
[21] Hoyos D., Mariel P. Contingent valuation: Past, present and future. Prague Economic Papers. 2010;4:329–343.
[22] Khai H.V., Yabe M. Consumer preferences for agriculture products considering the value of biodiversity
conservation in Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of
Nature Conservation. 2015;25:62-71.
[23] Tran T.T.D., Nomura H., Yabe M. Tourists’ preferences toward ecotourism development and sustainable
biodiversity conservation in protected areas of Vietnam – The case of Phu My protected area. Journal
of Agricultural Science. 2015;7(8):81-89.
[24] Phạm Hoàng Hải, Nguyễn Thượng Hùng, Nguyễn Ngọc Khánh. Cơ sở cảnh quan học của việc sử dụng
hợp lý tài nguyên thiên nhiên, bảo vệ môi trường lãnh thổ Việt Nam. Hà Nội: NXB Giáo dục; 1997.
[25] Chee Y.E. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation. 2004;120:549–565.
[26] Rudolf de Groot, Luke Brander, Sander van der Ploeg, Robert Costanza, Florence Bernard, Leon Braat, Mike Christie, et al. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services. 2012;1(1):50-61.
[27] Costanza R., De Groot R., Sutton P., Van Der Ploeg S., Anderson S.J., Kubiszewski I., Farber S., Turner R.K. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change. 2014;26(1):152-158.
[28] Loomis J., Kent P., Strange L., Fausch K., Covich A. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics. 2000;33:103–117.
[29] Bamwesigye D., Hlavackova P., Sujova A., Fialova J., Kupec P. Willingness to Pay for Forest Existence Value and Sustainability. Sustainability. 2020;12:891.
[30] Goldman R.L., Tallis H., Kareiva P., Daily G.C. Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2008;105(27):9445-9448.
[31] Shirk J.L., Ballard H.L., Wilderman C.C., et al. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society. 2012;17: 29.
[32] Khan S.U., Liu G., Zhao M., et al. Spatial prioritization of willingness to pay for ecosystem services. A novel notion of distance from origin’s impression. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27:3100–3112.