Main Article Content

Huy Minh Vo
Dung Thi My Huynh


A delay is an inevitable event in construction projects due to their intricacy and dynamic nature, therefore, the project parties frequently come to disputes about which party is liable for schedule delays. Delay analysis methods are gradually evolved and are used to steadily determine and apportion delay’s responsibilities. Notwithstanding, courts and arbitrary boards have not legalized any specific standard category of delay analysis technique to timely evaluate the impact of activity(es) delay on to total project duration. Also, there is no universal delay analysis method that can be used better than the others under certain circumstances. This research, thus, targets to seek the most appropriate and fundamental DAM for delay claims resolution. The study methodology adopted in the research by conducting an extensive literature review to identify current delay criteria which have much more impact on the selection of delay analysis method than existing delay analysis method is also carried out for an efficient discussion with a panel of experts. An Integrated Analytical Hierarchy Process and Relative Importance Index (AHP-RII) approach is ideally employed to analyze the highest and the most priority delay analysis method along with the critical factor weight influencing detecting the most proper type of delay analysis. Study findings are very authentic by fairly selecting the best delay analysis method based on reliable delay factors and available delay analysis methods. The researchers and practitioners may yield viable study outputs for incipiently practical preparation of a variety of data and documents which can be publicly supported as active and valid evidence for future claims.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Vo H, Huynh D. INDISPENSABLE DELAY ANALYSIS METHOD SELECTION: AN INTEGRATED AHP-RII APPROACH. journal [Internet]. 20Jul.2023 [cited 4Dec.2023];13(6). Available from:


[1] Le-Hoai L, Lee YD, Lee JY. Delay and cost overruns
in Vietnam large construction projects: A comparison
with other selected countries. KSCE Journal of Civil
Engineering. 2008;12(6): 367–377.
[2] Long ND, Ogunlana S, Quang T, Lam KC. Large
construction projects in developing countries: A case
study from Vietnam. International Journal of Project
Management. 2004;22(7): 553–561.
[3] Kavuma A, Ock J, Jang H. Factors influencing time
and cost overruns on freeform construction projects.
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 2019;23(4):
[4] Kim SY, Tuan KN, Luu VT. Delay factor analysis for
hospital projects in Vietnam. KSCE Journal of Civil
Engineering. 2016;20(2): 519–529.
[5] Abdelhadi Y, Dulaimi M, Bajracharya A. Factors
influencing the selection of delay analysis methods in
construction projects in UAE. International Journal
of Construction Management. 2018;19: 1–12.
[6] Abeysinghe N, Jayathilaka R. Factors influencing
the timely completion of construction projects in
Sri Lanka. Plos One. 2022;17(12): e0278318.
[7] Khoshgoftar M, Bakar AHA, Osman O.
Causes of delays in Iranian construction
projects. International Journal of Construction Management. 2014;10: 53–69.
[8] Yang J, Arditi D, Lee DE, Mutis I. Delay analysis
selection model for a construction project. KSCE
Journal of Civil Engineering. 2022;26(12): 4926–
[9] Huynh H, Lucko G, Eid M. Game theory
approach for concurrent delay analysis.
Journal of Construction Engineering and
Management. 2023;149(3): 04023002.
[10] Arditi D, Pattanakitchamroon T. Selecting a delay analysis method in resolving construction
claims. International Journal of Project Management.
2006;24(2): 145–155.
[11] Adhikari I, Kim SY. Selection of appropriate
schedule delay analysis method: Analytical
hierarchy process (AHP). In: Technology
Management for the Global Future – PICMET
2006, Conference. IEEE. 2006. p.483–488.
[12] Perera N, Sutrisna M, Yiu KTW. Decisionmaking model for selecting the optimum method
of delay analysis in construction projects. Journal of Management in Engineering. 2016;32(5):
[13] Cevikbas M, Is¸ık Z. Detecting the most appropriate delay analysis methods for mega airport projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 2023;30(6): 2463–2480.
[14] AACE International. International Recommended
Practices 29R-03. Forensic Delay Analysis. Morgantown, USA: AACE International; 2011.
[15] The Society of Construction Law. Delay and Discruption Protocol. Hinckley, UK: Society of Construction
Law; 2017.
[16] American Society of Civil Engineers. Schedule delay
analysis. Virginia, United States: American Society
of Civil Engineers; 2017.
[17] Saaty T. Decision making with the Analytic Hierarchy
Process. International Journal of Services Sciences.
2008;1: 83–98.
[18] Hossen MM, Kang S, Kim J. Construction schedule
delay risk assessment by using combined AHP-RII
methodology for an international NPP project. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2015;47(3): 362–379.
[19] Braimah N, Ndekugri I. Factors influencing the selection of delay analysis methodologies. International
Journal of Project Management. 2008;26(8): 789–799.
[20] Kao CK, Yang JB. Comparison of windows-based delay analysis methods. International Journal of Project
Management. 2009;27: 408–418.
[21] C¸ evikbas¸ M, Okudan O, Is¸ık Z. New delayanalysis method using modified schedule and modified updated schedule for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.
2022;148(11): 04022119.