INVESTIGATION OF 3D PRINTING PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE DEVIATION OF PRODUCT BY TAGUCHI METHOD
Article Sidebar
Published:
Jul 20, 2023
Keywords:
3D printing, 3D Scanning, FDM, Taguchi method
Main Article Content
Abstract
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing method is widely used in the manufacture of technical parts. The article aims to present the survey results of 3D printing parameters (layer height, printing speed, wall thickness) that affect the deviation of product created by the FDM printing method. In this study, 3D scanning technology was applied to measure and check the error of each printed hole. Taguchi method is used in the experiment to design and process data in Minitab software to generate results to evaluate the input values of the investigation. The research results show that the print speed parameter has the highest influence on the error whereas the print wall thickness parameter has the lowest effect. The research results can be used to eliminate the error in making samples by the FDM method.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
1.
Thach T, Pham P, Mai T. INVESTIGATION OF 3D PRINTING PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE DEVIATION OF PRODUCT BY TAGUCHI METHOD. journal [Internet]. 20Jul.2023 [cited 19May2024];13(6). Available from: https://journal.tvu.edu.vn/index.php/journal/article/view/2116
Section
Articles
References
[1] Hao B, Lin G. 3D printing technology and its
application in industrial manufacturing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;782: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-
899X/782/2/022065.
[2] Haghsefat K, Tingting L. 3D printing and traditional
manufacturing technology analysis and comparison.
In: 10th Conference on Iranian Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ISME). Tehran - Iran; 2020. p.1–4.
[3] Sunil K. 3D printing: A revolutionary transformation in manufacturing. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education.
2020;6(5): 1092–1113.
[4] Gu P, Li L. Fabrication of biomedical prototypes
with locally controlled properties using FDM. CIRP Annals. 2002;15(1): 181–184.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61495-4.
[5] Pham QP, Thach MT, Nguyen TK. Effect of printing parameters on surface topography of products
printed by FDM process. In: Proceedings of the 5th
International Conference on Research in Engineering
and Technology (RET). Vietnam: Tra Vinh University;
2022. p.160–164.
[6] Agrawal AP, Kumar V, Kumar J, Paramasivam P,
Dhanasekaran S, Prasad L. An investigation of combined effect of infill pattern, density, and layer thickness on mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS by
fused filament fabrication. Heliyon. 2023;9(6): 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16531.
[7] Mazlan M, Abdullah A, Anas M, Izmin
N. Effects of infill density, wall perimeter
and layer height in fabricating 3D printing
products. Materials (MDPI). 2023;16(2): 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020695.
[8] Rahmati S, Vahabli E. Evaluation of analytical modeling for improvement of surface roughness of FDM
test part using measurement results. The International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
2015;79: 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-
015-6879-7.
[9] Negrete C, Soriano J, Carreón J. The effects
of printing parameters on quality, strength, mass,
and processing time of polylactic acid specimens produced by additive manufacturing. Progress
in Additive Manufacturing. 2021;6(4): 821–840.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00198-y.
[10] Pham QP, Tang TM. Study on dimensional deviation of parts manufactured by 3D printing. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET). 2020;11(7): 614–621.
https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.11.7.2020.061.
[11] Farashi S, Vafaee F. Effect of printing parameters on
the tensile strength of FDM 3D samples: a metaanalysis focusing on layer thickness and sample orientation. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2022;7:
565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00247-
6.
[12] Agarwal KM, Shubham P, Bhatia D, Sharma P,
Vaid H, Vajpeyi R. Analyzing the impact of
print parameters on dimensional variation of abs
specimens printed using fused deposition modelling (FDM). Sensors International. 2022;3: 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100149.
[13] Espino M, Tuazon B, Robles G, Dizon J.
Application of Taguchi methodology in evaluating
the Rockwell hardness of SLA 3D printed polymers.
Materials Science Forum. 2021;1005: 166–173.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1005.
166.
[14] Peng WANG, Bin ZOU, Shouling DING, Lei
LI, Huang C. Effects of FDM-3D printing
parameters on mechanical properties and
microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. Chinese
Journal of Aeronautics. 2021;34(9): 236–246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040.
[15] Algarni M, Ghazali S. Comparative study of the
sensitivity of PLA, ABS, PEEK, and PETG’s
mechanical properties to FDM printing process
parameters. Crystals. 2021;11(8): 529–551.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080995.
application in industrial manufacturing. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;782: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-
899X/782/2/022065.
[2] Haghsefat K, Tingting L. 3D printing and traditional
manufacturing technology analysis and comparison.
In: 10th Conference on Iranian Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ISME). Tehran - Iran; 2020. p.1–4.
[3] Sunil K. 3D printing: A revolutionary transformation in manufacturing. International Journal of Advance Research and Innovative Ideas in Education.
2020;6(5): 1092–1113.
[4] Gu P, Li L. Fabrication of biomedical prototypes
with locally controlled properties using FDM. CIRP Annals. 2002;15(1): 181–184.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61495-4.
[5] Pham QP, Thach MT, Nguyen TK. Effect of printing parameters on surface topography of products
printed by FDM process. In: Proceedings of the 5th
International Conference on Research in Engineering
and Technology (RET). Vietnam: Tra Vinh University;
2022. p.160–164.
[6] Agrawal AP, Kumar V, Kumar J, Paramasivam P,
Dhanasekaran S, Prasad L. An investigation of combined effect of infill pattern, density, and layer thickness on mechanical properties of 3D printed ABS by
fused filament fabrication. Heliyon. 2023;9(6): 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16531.
[7] Mazlan M, Abdullah A, Anas M, Izmin
N. Effects of infill density, wall perimeter
and layer height in fabricating 3D printing
products. Materials (MDPI). 2023;16(2): 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020695.
[8] Rahmati S, Vahabli E. Evaluation of analytical modeling for improvement of surface roughness of FDM
test part using measurement results. The International
Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
2015;79: 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-
015-6879-7.
[9] Negrete C, Soriano J, Carreón J. The effects
of printing parameters on quality, strength, mass,
and processing time of polylactic acid specimens produced by additive manufacturing. Progress
in Additive Manufacturing. 2021;6(4): 821–840.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00198-y.
[10] Pham QP, Tang TM. Study on dimensional deviation of parts manufactured by 3D printing. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET). 2020;11(7): 614–621.
https://doi.org/10.34218/IJARET.11.7.2020.061.
[11] Farashi S, Vafaee F. Effect of printing parameters on
the tensile strength of FDM 3D samples: a metaanalysis focusing on layer thickness and sample orientation. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 2022;7:
565–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-021-00247-
6.
[12] Agarwal KM, Shubham P, Bhatia D, Sharma P,
Vaid H, Vajpeyi R. Analyzing the impact of
print parameters on dimensional variation of abs
specimens printed using fused deposition modelling (FDM). Sensors International. 2022;3: 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100149.
[13] Espino M, Tuazon B, Robles G, Dizon J.
Application of Taguchi methodology in evaluating
the Rockwell hardness of SLA 3D printed polymers.
Materials Science Forum. 2021;1005: 166–173.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.1005.
166.
[14] Peng WANG, Bin ZOU, Shouling DING, Lei
LI, Huang C. Effects of FDM-3D printing
parameters on mechanical properties and
microstructure of CF/PEEK and GF/PEEK. Chinese
Journal of Aeronautics. 2021;34(9): 236–246.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.040.
[15] Algarni M, Ghazali S. Comparative study of the
sensitivity of PLA, ABS, PEEK, and PETG’s
mechanical properties to FDM printing process
parameters. Crystals. 2021;11(8): 529–551.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11080995.