Main Article Content
Vietnamese universities have seen an increase in demand for quality improvement of their programs and teaching performance. However, the degree to which high-quality programs and teaching performance is determined by students’ hardiness in learning, and their assessment in university education. This study was employed to examine the relationships of hardiness and learning outcome, quality of life on students, and quality of university life on students in Tra Vinh University. The study uses Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) and the sample of 341 economic sector students in Tra Vinh University. The findings have indicated that hardiness in learning has a positive relationship with three elements including (i) learning outcome, (ii) quality of life on students, and (iii) quality of university life on students. Besides that, the results also indicated that three attitudes of commitment, control, and challenge have a direct effect on hardiness, while teacher elements have a powerful impact on the students’ quality of university life. The study also contributes some implications for the improvement of teaching quality and the stimulation for students’ behavioral intention of hardiness and attitudes.
health: an inquiry into hardiness. Journal of Personalit and Social Psychology. 1979;37(1).
 Furr S R, Westefeld J S, McConnell G N, Jenkins
J M. Suicide and depression among college students:
A decade later. Professional Psychology: Research
and Practice. 2001;32(1):97–100.
 Maddi S R. The story of hardiness: Twenty years
of theorizing, research and practice. Consulting
Psychology Journal. 2002;54(3):173–185.
 Young M R, Klemz B R, Murphy J W. Enhancing
learning outcomes: the effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and
student behaviour. Journal of Marketing Education.
 Cole M S, Field H S, Harris S G. Student learning
motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive
effects on students’ reactions to a management class.
Academy of Management Learning and Education.
 Sirgy M J, Grzeskowiak S, Rahtz D. Quality of
college life of students: Developing and validating a
measure of well-being. Social Indicators Research.
 Nguyen T T M, Nguyen T D. Determinants of learning performance of business students in a transitional
market. Quality Assurance in Education. 2010;18(4).
 Nguyen T D, Shultz II C J, Westbrook M D. Psychological Hardiness in Learning and Quality of College
Life of Business Students: Evidence from Vietnam.
Journal of Happiness Studies. 2012;13(6):1091–
 Bartone P T, Eid J, Johnsen B H, Laberg J C, Snook
S A. Big five personality factors, hardiness, and
social judgment as predictors of leader performance.
Leadership & Organization Development Journal.
 Rodney A McCloy, John P Campbell, Robert Cudeck. A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology.
 Brokaw A J, Thomas E Merz. The effects of student
behavior and preferred learning style on performance.
Journal of Business Education. 2000;48(1):15–20.
 Vaez M, Kristenson M, Laflamme L. Peceived
quality of life and self-rated health among first-year
university students: A comparison with their working
peers. Social Indicators Research. 2004;68(2):221–
 Cha K –H. Subjective well-being among
college students. Social Indicators Research.
 Chow H P H. Life satisfaction among university students in a Canadian prairie city: A multivariate analysis. Social Indicators Research. 2005;70(2):139–150.
 Maddi S R. Comments on trends in hardiness research
and theorizing. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice & Research. 1999;51(2):67–71.
 Peterson M, Ekici A. Consumer Attitude toward Marketing and Subjective Quality of Life in the Context
of a Developing Country. Journal of Macromarketing.
 Kenneth A Bollen. Structural Equations With
Latent Variables. Journal of the American
Statistical Association. 1990 December;DOI:
 Nunnally, Burnstein. Pschychometric Theory. 3rd ed.
NewYork: McGraw Hill; 1994.
 Field A. Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows; 2000.
 Gerbing D W, Anderson J C. An Updated Paradigm
for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and its Assessment. Journal of Marketing
 Carmines E, McIver J. Analyzing models with unobserved variables: analysis of covariance structures.
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1981.
 Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significane tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.
Psychological Bulletin. 1980;88(3):588–606.
 Steiger J H. Structural Modeling Evaluation and
Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 1990;25(2):173–80.
 Nguyễn Đình Thọ, Nguyễn Thị Mai Trang. Nghiên
cứu khoa học marketing - ứng dụng mô hình cấu trúc
tuyến tính SEM. Nhà Xuất bản Đại học Quốc gia TP.
 Hair J F, Black W C, Babin B J, Anderson R E,
Tatham R L. Multivariate data analysis. 7th ed.
Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.
 Hair, Anderson, Tatham. Black Multivariate Data
Analysis. Prentical-Hall International, Inc; 1998.
 Steenkamp J B E M, Laflamme L. Perceived quality
of life and self-rated health among first-year university students: A comparision with their working peers.
Social Indicators Research. 2004;68(2):221–234.
 Hair J, Black W, Babin B. Anderson R Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA:
Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 2010.
 Schumacker R E, Lomax R G. A beginner’s guide
to Structural Equation Modeling. London: Lawrence
Erlbaum associates; 2006.